Since November of
2006, I have been involved in statewide programs. Much of my focus has been on
the seamless and appropriate integration of technology into reading, writing,
speaking, and listening about content. This week, I had the opportunity to have
some serious discussions with instructional technology coaches who have been on
that journey for nearly as long as I have. Upon reflection, I realized that,
despite the fact that they have been working with their teachers for many
years, our conversation still centered around whether we were using an LMS,
which one we were using, and if GAFE or O365 was the right answer.
We lamented the fact
that each of the schools has determined that there is not time in a student's
school day for formal learning of technology. As a result, teachers are
unwilling to try new technologies for fear that they'll have to spend a
significant amount of instructional time teaching the tool. Our lament
continued…, if no one teaches the skills, that excuse for not using the
technology will continue to be valid.
All of us are still
spending a considerable amount of time thinking about how teachers can post
assignments and learning resources, create self-grading multiple-choice tests,
and organize their thinking using digital tools. Don't get me wrong. These are all
solid results of 1:1's, easy access to carts of tablets, computers, Chrome
Books, and BYOD. However, it became clear to me that, 10 years later, we are
still focused on logistics. And the folks I was talking with are the coaches
who "get it." They understand that the role of technology is to be
used to help students grow in their understanding of content, while creating,
communicating, collaborating, and thinking critically. These are the coaches
who spend time consulting with teachers on their instructional goals, gather
data for them during lessons, and then provide opportunities for teachers to
reflect on evidence from their lessons.
All of those around
the table philosophically agreed that the combination of a master teacher and
appropriate use of technology can engage students with content. Injecting
job-embedded professional development, instructional coaching, into the mix
provides ample opportunity for the continuation of PD beyond the drop-in
session. Yet, 10 years later, none of us is where we want to be.
There is still so
much work to be done.
No comments:
Post a Comment